...or so one company would have you believe.
Last night while flipping through Vanity Fair I came across an advert in which Angelina Jolie takes sexy centre stage. There she is, looking beautiful, sultry and care-free on a rickety Asian boat, floating down the river. At first glance, nothing unusual, just another gorgeous woman in a glossy magazine. I took a second glance, though, because it looked curiously like a boat, and a river, that I myself floated down a few years ago in Cambodia. A third glance...
...and then I'm suddenly filled with rage. A rage that left me tossing and turning and stormy all night, and that probably had my co-workers ready to beat me this morning.
Here it is.
It's the bag.
There Angelina is, in one of the poorest countries on earth, on a boat in the middle of nowhere, with nothing but a Louis Vuitton luxury handbag.
Talk about a juxtaposition of imagery.
I did a little bit of browsing today to find out more about this ad campaign. That's when I learned it was part of a larger series called "Core Values". Right, because that's whatshe we need when we go to poverty-ridden post-conflict zones; just a little reminder about what we value most and can't live without. A designer handbag.
According to some sites on the web, Angelina is not wearing any make-up, is wearing her own clothes, and the bag is her very own Vuitton. The campaign - photographed by Annie Liebovitz - aims to show real life, real moments, real people.
I'm no Annie Liebovitz, but I can show you some real life, real moments and real people.
Seriously, I don't think floating down the lush river (perhaps the Mekong, but more likely Tonle Sap lake near Siem Reap in Northwestern Cambodia) with a Louis Vuitton handbag and a Hollywood star shows us anything about real people and real life. Not real Cambodian people anyway.
I know Jolie has done wonderful things, and that Cambodia is very close to her heart (because her eldest son was adopted from Cambodia). The world admires her for that.
And, she likely gaveall some of the proceeds to charity, like the Jolie Pitt Foundation.
But that's the problem.
Real people don't need charity. They need real jobs. Real opportunities. Real dignity.
Angelina's star power would do wonders to promote a local Cambodian designer. I would love to see her in Vanity Fair advertising the luxurious silk handwoven by Cambodian women. I would love to see her leverage her power, not to gather donations for charities, but to build economies and empower real Cambodians to earn their way out of poverty.
Instead, there's not a Cambodian nor a Cambodian product in sight.
Just a pretty girl. On a boat. With a Louis Vuitton bag.
Because hey, poverty is sexy.
Last night while flipping through Vanity Fair I came across an advert in which Angelina Jolie takes sexy centre stage. There she is, looking beautiful, sultry and care-free on a rickety Asian boat, floating down the river. At first glance, nothing unusual, just another gorgeous woman in a glossy magazine. I took a second glance, though, because it looked curiously like a boat, and a river, that I myself floated down a few years ago in Cambodia. A third glance...
...and then I'm suddenly filled with rage. A rage that left me tossing and turning and stormy all night, and that probably had my co-workers ready to beat me this morning.
Here it is.
![]() | ||||
| ||||
It's the bag.
There Angelina is, in one of the poorest countries on earth, on a boat in the middle of nowhere, with nothing but a Louis Vuitton luxury handbag.
Talk about a juxtaposition of imagery.
I did a little bit of browsing today to find out more about this ad campaign. That's when I learned it was part of a larger series called "Core Values". Right, because that's what
According to some sites on the web, Angelina is not wearing any make-up, is wearing her own clothes, and the bag is her very own Vuitton. The campaign - photographed by Annie Liebovitz - aims to show real life, real moments, real people.
I'm no Annie Liebovitz, but I can show you some real life, real moments and real people.
Seriously, I don't think floating down the lush river (perhaps the Mekong, but more likely Tonle Sap lake near Siem Reap in Northwestern Cambodia) with a Louis Vuitton handbag and a Hollywood star shows us anything about real people and real life. Not real Cambodian people anyway.
I know Jolie has done wonderful things, and that Cambodia is very close to her heart (because her eldest son was adopted from Cambodia). The world admires her for that.
And, she likely gave
But that's the problem.
Real people don't need charity. They need real jobs. Real opportunities. Real dignity.
Angelina's star power would do wonders to promote a local Cambodian designer. I would love to see her in Vanity Fair advertising the luxurious silk handwoven by Cambodian women. I would love to see her leverage her power, not to gather donations for charities, but to build economies and empower real Cambodians to earn their way out of poverty.
![]() |
| Part of the fair trade Cambodian silk collection at Bambootique. |
Instead, there's not a Cambodian nor a Cambodian product in sight.
Just a pretty girl. On a boat. With a Louis Vuitton bag.
Because hey, poverty is sexy.














